3 ms·

This kind of predictable snark falls way short of the standards of discourse for this site. Please review the guidelines and stop posting like this here. https

• woahhvicky 9y ago
  This wasn't snark. It's pointing out a real problem with the premise of this article. It's creating a narrative of adjunct professor exploitation based on anecdotal cases. For all we know, these anecdotes are outliers and their situation isn't due to their profession or its pay. I could have said all that or I could have been concise. Is being concise snark?