3 ms·
Yes, but that’s not because she’s a woman (as she appears to claim), it’s because she hasn’t come to some sort of agreement about how to run the house. She’s ta
by showmetherec 9y ago
Yes, but that’s not because she’s a woman (as she appears to claim), it’s because she hasn’t come to some sort of agreement about how to run the house. She’s talking past her husband to millions of people.
Had the gender roles been swapped, it would have been a very hard to stomach article for a lot of people.
- TheOtherHobbes 9y agoWhich is why it's sexist. The implication is that if her husband were a better feminist he would be perfectly able to anticipate and provide everything she wanted in a friction-free and effortless way. The fact that he doesn't proves he's still mired in patriarchy, which of course he needs to be educated out of. Assuming your partner is sort of okay, I guess, but essentially ideologically defective is not a particularly healthy basis for a relationship. Aside from chores, it's not as it men - feminist or not - never provide emotional support to women. I would be astonished if the husband never listened to problems, provided cuddles and backrubs, and all the other emotional maintenance that men give their partners. I sometimes think this culture has a very poor record of educating people how adult relationships are supposed to work. Unfortunately this article seems to be an example of that.