5 ms·

This varies hugely by school. A lot of state run Universities have very competitive salaries because their reputation depends on retaining rock star professors.

by throwaway2016a 9y ago

This varies hugely by school. A lot of state run Universities have very competitive salaries because their reputation depends on retaining rock star professors. Adjuncts are a different story. I taught as an adjunct part time at a state school where professor made $150k. I made $5000 per course. I did it more of less for fun because I like teaching. Which is not bad for extra pay on the side but terrible if it is your only pay. Edit: as a side note, the department head told me she fought to have adjunct Comp Sci professors make more because the field is in such high demand. I am sure English adjunts at the same school make far less.

aswanson 9y ago
Are compsci phds in high demand in academia, or do they suffer the same oversupply condition as the general professorial market?
- kd0amg 9y ago
  There is less of an oversupply because it's easier for CS PhDs to just go to industry (possibly in a non-research position) than it is in a lot of other fields, but I think it's still unrealistic to expect every CS PhD who seeks a tenure-track position to find one.
  - mywittyname 9y ago
    Actually, I would think it would be easier to get a tenure track professorship as a CS PhD. The number of CS-related grant opportunities is staggering.
    - kd0amg 9y ago
      Easier than in other fields, yes, but also definitely not so easy that anyone who makes a serious attempt will manage it.
- throwaway2016a 9y ago
  The irony is I don't have a Phd or Masters for that matter (I do have a BS). The universities much like industry would rather have someone with huge relevant industry experience than someone who has a Phd. It looks better on their marketing to say "We have the person who invented X, used by millions of websites" or "We have this best selling author" (in the English world) than "We have a person who got their Phd" That's for adjuncts though. I think for full-time professors they have PhD requirements per the accreditation boards that they need to maintain. But once the quota is met they can hire anyone.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
BeetleB 9y ago
>Adjuncts are a different story. The article gives a median income of under $50K for non-adjuncts. Of course, that includes assistant/associate professors.
- throwaway2016a 9y ago
  It varies greatly by school and reputation. I doubt it is because of associate professors. More likely it is because of the size of the school, location, and type. I bet there are a lot of community college students in there. A quick look in my area (New England) shows associates starting at about $60k and going up from there. But New England has a high cost of living so it is all relative.
Analog24 9y ago
You can't compare an adjunct professor to a full-time (assistant/associate/full) professor. I would not consider adjunct professors to be 'academics' as they do not typically do any research. They're basically lecturers, not professors.

aswanson 9y ago

Are compsci phds in high demand in academia, or do they suffer the same oversupply condition as the general professorial market?

kd0amg 9y ago
There is less of an oversupply because it's easier for CS PhDs to just go to industry (possibly in a non-research position) than it is in a lot of other fields, but I think it's still unrealistic to expect every CS PhD who seeks a tenure-track position to find one.
- mywittyname 9y ago
  Actually, I would think it would be easier to get a tenure track professorship as a CS PhD. The number of CS-related grant opportunities is staggering.
  - kd0amg 9y ago
    Easier than in other fields, yes, but also definitely not so easy that anyone who makes a serious attempt will manage it.
throwaway2016a 9y ago
The irony is I don't have a Phd or Masters for that matter (I do have a BS). The universities much like industry would rather have someone with huge relevant industry experience than someone who has a Phd. It looks better on their marketing to say "We have the person who invented X, used by millions of websites" or "We have this best selling author" (in the English world) than "We have a person who got their Phd" That's for adjuncts though. I think for full-time professors they have PhD requirements per the accreditation boards that they need to maintain. But once the quota is met they can hire anyone.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]

BeetleB 9y ago

>Adjuncts are a different story. The article gives a median income of under $50K for non-adjuncts. Of course, that includes assistant/associate professors.

throwaway2016a 9y ago
It varies greatly by school and reputation. I doubt it is because of associate professors. More likely it is because of the size of the school, location, and type. I bet there are a lot of community college students in there. A quick look in my area (New England) shows associates starting at about $60k and going up from there. But New England has a high cost of living so it is all relative.

Analog24 9y ago

You can't compare an adjunct professor to a full-time (assistant/associate/full) professor. I would not consider adjunct professors to be 'academics' as they do not typically do any research. They're basically lecturers, not professors.