4 ms·
Why? Humans drive today without any of this, and with much less sensory perception than 360-degree cameras, radar, lidar, ultrasonics, GPS anchoring, and digita
by freerobby 9y ago
Why? Humans drive today without any of this, and with much less sensory perception than 360-degree cameras, radar, lidar, ultrasonics, GPS anchoring, and digital maps. What's the limitation on being able to synthesize these inputs and respond to them?
- kelvin0 9y agoI don't think machines currently have enough contextual information to be able to drive fully automated. Case in point: the limitations mentioned in the article. I don't think you can compare human cognition and driving abilities to current AI/Hardware, since the roads and all the information to drive are geared towards humans. This being said: I do believe fully automated cars will come, but the 2 conditions I mentioned are prerequisites (in my opinion).
- falcolas 9y agoComputation power and reliability. Visual identification algorithms are not fast enough to keep up with driving, let alone distance, direction, and speed inference. Speeding them up is a largely parallel job, but cars don't have the space/power/temperature-controlled/vibration-free environment to support the necessary hardware.