How does one go about proving a falsehood with absolutely no basis in truth? How do I prove the absence of allegedly subpar safety measures and private payroll

How does one go about proving a falsehood with absolutely no basis in truth? How do I prove the absence of allegedly subpar safety measures and private payroll information of GM? This is not a scientific approach. I substantiated my claim with reference to the article, and extensive information about GM’s vehicle is not present on their website beyond this, which lists a number of comparable safety features to the smart car: http://media.gm.com/media/cn/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/cn/en/2017/July/0721_SAIC-GM-Wuling-Launches-Baojun-E100.html http://media.gm.com/media/cn/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/... Let's stay on track here - this isn't about your irrelevant experiences traveling in China. Trolls use exactly this tactic to waste the time of dubious readers, in an apparent attempt to shift the burden of proof to anybody that’d bother. I'm not going to disprove every vague, unrelated anecdote you're willing to share. I don’t know where you hail from, but as an anglo-American citizen, let me be clear: this jingoistic willingness to support bullshit about American manufacturing in China makes the USA look pathetic and fearful about the rise of competitors. It is feckless to encourage English readers on HN with nonsense - the net effect is to stir readers into underestimating the vast safety engineering talent in China.