3 ms·
You only read the first sentence and not the rest it seems. I said exactly that, that you can't use biometrics for an identification protocol. I still disagree
by ecesena 9y ago
You only read the first sentence and not the rest it seems. I said exactly that, that you can't use biometrics for an identification protocol.
I still disagree on the username. You know my username here and on twitter, you don't know my fingerprint. And no, you can't repro my fingerprint so easily as you think because "fingerprint reader" is a short for a sophisticated piece of hardware that measures other things, e.g. blood pressure.
On the research, I didn't say biometrics can be revoked. I said you can build a function of biometrics info, whose result can be revoked [1]. No one is disagreeing with your premises, but this doesn't mean that the problem has no solutions.
[1] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=revocable+biometrics https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=revoca...