4 ms·
Debatable. I'd say it's a cellphone for which no infrastructure currently exists, which admittedly doesn't make it a very useful cellphone unless and until thos
by PhasmaFelis 9y ago
Debatable. I'd say it's a cellphone for which no infrastructure currently exists, which admittedly doesn't make it a very useful cellphone unless and until those changes occur. But a car is still a car even if there's no gas stations.
- IncRnd 9y agoa cellphone for which no infrastructure exists A cellphone that doesn't work with cellular network cells and isn't a phone really shouldn't be called a cellphone. It's a passively-powered radio.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- detaro 9y agoBut we have better terms for phones working in a range of a few meters around a local base station: cordless phone