3 ms·
It doesn't load for me either. I suspect this is upvoted on the basis of its title and well-known submitter.
by acangiano 16y ago
It doesn't load for me either. I suspect this is upvoted on the basis of its title and well-known submitter.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoReally? People upvote things without reading them? Wow. That just seems dishonest. I hope it's not the case. Can anyone who has read it provide a summary to restore my faith in human nature and HN readers? Thanks. ADDED IN EDIT: As of 15:32 Zulu time this has comment is on Karma 0, so it has received at least one down-mod. It's interesting to speculate why. Perhaps someone just thinks it adds noise to the site - yet more navel-gazing - which is against the culture. That's fair enough. But perhaps it's someone who does upvote things without reading them and thinks it's unfair that they are called dishonest for doing so. If you think it's not dishonest to upvote something without reading it, if you think it's fair and reasonable to upvote something without reading it, I'd like to hear your point of view and reason for believing that. Thanks. ADDED IN FURTHER EDIT: The comment has now had at least one upvote, so it would appear at least one person agrees with me. I find this sort of feedback an interesting insight into the mindset of the people who read HN. Thank you.