I'm going to get all spacey here, but if it crashes and creates nothing, is that nothing itself art? Or is the coder and the computer working together in the p

I'm going to get all spacey here, but if it crashes and creates nothing, is that nothing itself art? Or is the coder and the computer working together in the plan to create auto-generated art, actually the work of art. I think with art it's very abstract, with code it's a little fuzzy too. The creation of the AI is what's novel to me, that's the smart thing. It's like creating a process of producing the end result which is the code,text etc. The output is the output of the AI. The person who owns the process most likely owns the output. Right no the process and code to the AI is yours. If you decide to license someone else to use the process and build on it. Then I guess they own the output, but that's something that would be negotiated. I really don't know, I'm just thinking out loud. We may need a lawyer, a philosopher and an ethicist to thrash this out to get a real answer.