3 ms·
Couldn't the old owners just open new factory farms and outcompete the now-free range ones by being cheaper?
by robertwiblin 9y ago
Couldn't the old owners just open new factory farms and outcompete the now-free range ones by being cheaper?
- EGreg 9y agoWell can't the same argument be made for cutting costs in prisons and working inmates to the hilt?
- apenwarr 9y agoOf course. That's why you need regulations, not billionaires, in both cases.
- EGreg 9y agoSo can advocates of capitalism admit that it needs to be regulated? How would factory farms have been abolished under anarcho capitalism? How would child labor or sweatshops be abolished? They say that under the NAP there would be no coersion, but clearly there is. They say private ownership of animals will prevent their extinction, like commercial bees. That may be true but what about their welfare?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- civilian 9y agoA better answer is hiding in your posts. It's that: We believe that humans, even criminals, have dignity and should be treated decently despite their wrongdoings. The argument, then, is that we could extend that "deserving of decent treatment" to animals. It doesn't need a billionaire to make this happen (which is why you're confusing me), it just needs culture to change.
- EGreg 9y agoMy question I guess is this: Does unregulated Capitalism have the mechanisms to abolish such things with time? If there remain even 10% of meat eaters who want to pay $1 for a hamburger, who can stop the factory farms?? The only thing I can think of is a billionaire buying all the animals the way slaves were redeemed for money in some countries. After that no competing farms could start because they wouldn't have the animals to start with.