> your biometrics can't be easily stolen, and you can't lose them. Fingerprints are very different from face. Someone has to actually follow you around and clo

> your biometrics can't be easily stolen, and you can't lose them. Fingerprints are very different from face. Someone has to actually follow you around and clone your fingerprint from something you touched. With facial unlock, as virtually all previous systems have demonstrated, you usually only need someone's online photo, or a close variation of that to unlock a device/system that uses face unlock. With everyone plastering their photos in high resolution all over the web these days, and with machine learning advancing so fast these days, how long until a system like this is defeated? Do you really think "3D photos" of you can't be created? Or even ones that test for "liveness". What exactly do you think that "liveness test" is? It's just an algorithm that Apple uses. That algorithm can be reverse-engineered. Also, Apple's Face ID has a False Acceptance Rate of 1 million versus TouchID "only" 50,000, is very misleading. That metric only works when you think of an attacker throwing completely random faces at the system. Do you think an attacker that wants your phone is going to throw random faces at the device? Or do you think it's far more likely that it will start building that 3D profile out of your high-resolution online photos? Suddenly that 1 million FAR becomes much smaller, as the difference in profile from what the attacker has already gathered on you from public websites is much smaller than how you look like in real life. This is what may actually make the Face ID system less secure overall than TouchID. It's just way way easier to get someone's pictures than it is to get their fingerprints.