4 ms·
Can someone help me understand why @gre got down-votes here? I don't get it. As far as I remember, in the big reveal, they did make a point of saying that face
by jv22222 9y ago
Can someone help me understand why @gre got down-votes here? I don't get it.
As far as I remember, in the big reveal, they did make a point of saying that faceid had a much lower chance of of colliding than the fingerprintid system.
- skiman10 9y agoHe got downvoted because he said something that didn't match up with what OP said. In the presentation, Apple said > The probability of a false match is different for twins and siblings that look like you So that means the 1 in a 1,000,000 chance doesn't make sense here because Apple said the probability is different in regards to twins and siblings that look like you. So @gre just spouted off the statistic when OP was asking what the probability might be in regards to twins and siblings, because Apple says that it is different.
- matthewmacleod 9y agoThey did, but the quote above was about confusion between twins or siblings. Those are explicitly not random people.
- __jal 9y agoI'm not the down-voters, but my guess is due to citing the 1-in-a-million figure, which is Apple's claim about a random false positive, in response to a question about false positives with twins. Someone reading fast or simply not thinking critically could come away with the wrong impression.