4 ms·
Tech websites need to stop giving these projects coverage. This is not Atari... Atari is gone. Slapping licensed games and selling a shiny box with common int
by hoopism 9y ago
Tech websites need to stop giving these projects coverage. This is not Atari... Atari is gone. Slapping licensed games and selling a shiny box with common internals is not novel and will not somehow grow a magical following. Ouya was the best example but there's been dozens if not hundreds since.
I know it's a content driven world but techcrunch, kotaku, polywhatever needs to stop.
- fhood 9y agoUnless you are Nintendo, In that case you will make bank.
- hoopism 9y agoNintendo is still Nintendo. It's the same company. Making hardware based on it's own IP. Many titles being their own in house produced work. Nostalgia works when it's genuine.
- fhood 9y agoFair enough, but that little box does have an Atari logo on it. How many people are going to look deeper than that?
- mindcrime 9y agoTech websites need to stop giving these projects coverage. Why? There are people who want to know about this kind of thing. This is not Atari... Atari is gone. So? Slapping licensed games and selling a shiny box with common internals is not novel and will not somehow grow a magical following. Why do you think it needs a "magical following"? Isn't it enough that there's market demand for this box and they are serving that demand?
- j2bax 9y agoFrom my perspective, its a novel little gaming computer with a neat industrial design and an Atari license. I don't see any reason the tech news shouldn't cover it unless they are inundated with higher interest news for the day.
- hoopism 9y agoBecause time after time the majority of these have turned out to be bad actors buying up old licenses, putting a few thousand into marketing and deceiving a large audience into buying into a vision of a console supported by hoardes of indie developers. It's a narrative that has played enough times that it warrants at a minimum skepticism. Like it or not when you do writeups based solely on the press release it lends credibility to the project. Personally I think a little diligence and curation would go a long way. Most these projects end up being funded when these sites all run to be first to publish... nobody actually spends time investigating whether the people involved have track record or whether claims are even reasonable... all of a sudden overnight it's funded... that sucks.
- j2bax 9y agoI don't think its really the news sites job to care about a products viability for longterm success. Almost all software/hardware is pretty short lived when you think about it. They'd be pretty hard up for articles if they only covered the stuff that was going to be around for the next decade. It looks interesting, their readers enjoy reading about it. It probably will ultimately fail, like most products.
- hoopism 9y ago"I don't think its really the news sites job to care about a products viability for longterm success" Viability and credibility should not be confused. Under your definition if I buy the Coleco name tomorrow and send a press release with a high res image of a console then it's perfectly fine for news sites to just republish my press release without knowing who I am, what I have done or whether what I have claimed is true. This by the way is the primary means of funding on crowdfunding sites... I just disagree with you.
- shmerl 9y agoWe need more computers with Linux preinstalled. So don't complain and appreciate that it's happening.