3 ms·
To be accurate, it was not the cancer of "Open Source", it was the cancer of the GPL.
by X86BSD 9y ago
To be accurate, it was not the cancer of "Open Source", it was the cancer of the GPL.
- calcifer 9y agoBallmer meant the GPL, but he literally [0] said "Linux is a cancer". [0] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_cancer/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_...
- X86BSD 9y agoI do not see the difference since Linux is not synonymous with Open Source but IS synonymous with the GPL.