3 ms·
While that might be true to a degree, chances are that what is really going on here is that it is more profitable to externalize the costs of insufficient authe
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 9y ago
While that might be true to a degree, chances are that what is really going on here is that it is more profitable to externalize the costs of insufficient authentication to unsuspecting people. While both result in higher profits, one does so by actually increasing the value that is being created while the other does so by making a third party pay, possibly even more than the increase in profit, so one of them is more efficient for society, while the other is just more efficient for the company but might still even be less efficient for society overall.
- zxcmx 9y agoI understand, but in practice the fraud liability when it comes to identifying parties between two huge companies is very, very clearly laid out. As in, weeks or months or years of discussion. Not talking about credit cards thougn which are kind of a special case, where yes, totally merchant gets screwed.