4 ms·
Either way, "identity theft" or "credit fraud", the onus is on someone other than the corporation that let it happen. It's the victim, or the criminal, but nei
by wccrawford 9y ago
Either way, "identity theft" or "credit fraud", the onus is on someone other than the corporation that let it happen. It's the victim, or the criminal, but neither of them blame the corporation with the name alone.
So I don't see any point in trying to get millions of people to change what they call it, if that's the other option.
- panopticon 9y agoI think the point is to change the way people think about the situation. If you reframe the problem for enough people, it might become an issue politicians campaign with.
- wccrawford 9y agoExactly, but as I pointed out, they've failed to reframe it so that the company is at fault. It's still the same thing under those 2 names. They're putting all that work into a new name that doesn't do what they want.