> you seem to not be replying to my actual comment. Sorry, I was sort of replying to both yours and the comment below it. neither of them mentioned free speech

> you seem to not be replying to my actual comment. Sorry, I was sort of replying to both yours and the comment below it. neither of them mentioned free speech but it was sure to come up. > if your rules imply that you need to censor the democratically elected leader of the US, then there's something wrong with your rules So if I run a micro-blogging service and I make a rule which says "hey, nobody's allowed to be racist on here, ok?" and then Donald Trump signs up and says something racist, my rules are wrong because he's the president? Where's the logic in that? If the president breaks the law, is there something wrong with that law too? So we're clear here, twitter does not have any such rule. I'm suggesting it should.