3 ms·

> Probably would've been interesting if development kept up, but without it I think I'm just not going to try to get it installed. Out of curiosity, why is thi

> Probably would've been interesting if development kept up, but without it I think I'm just not going to try to get it installed. Out of curiosity, why is this an issue? Wouldn't you have just downloaded the library and run it regardless of whether someone is actively developing it or not? I don't really understand this argument (and I see many people making it, not just you).

ChrisRackauckas 9y ago
Well vanilla ODE solvers are a dime a dozen. Sufficiently optimized stiff ODE solvers tend to get around the same efficiency, with some methods doing better on some problems, and others doing better on other problems. So it's all problem dependent and this is just one implicit RK method, while things like ARKODE already have quite a few, FATODE has quite a few, and DifferentialEquations.jl has quite a few, etc, meaning I wouldn't expect it to be too different. What would make it exciting to play with if it added something. Free parallelism or uses the Xeon Phi automatically, complex number support, event handling (many examples where this is necessary. One: PDE solvers need this for adding projection steps). But since development has halted, we're pretty much guaranteed that none of this will ever come.
3JPLW 9y ago
The fact that it's not licensed for redistribution or even any regular use is a pretty good reason to not futz with it. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/what-if-pre-release-license-agreement/ https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/what-if-pre-releas... > Intel grants to you a non-exclusive, non-assignable copyright license to make only the minimum number of copies of the Materials reasonably necessary for your internal testing and development of your products. > You may not distribute any portion of Materials, whether in source or binary form, to any third party, except as specified in this Agreement.

ChrisRackauckas 9y ago

Well vanilla ODE solvers are a dime a dozen. Sufficiently optimized stiff ODE solvers tend to get around the same efficiency, with some methods doing better on some problems, and others doing better on other problems. So it's all problem dependent and this is just one implicit RK method, while things like ARKODE already have quite a few, FATODE has quite a few, and DifferentialEquations.jl has quite a few, etc, meaning I wouldn't expect it to be too different. What would make it exciting to play with if it added something. Free parallelism or uses the Xeon Phi automatically, complex number support, event handling (many examples where this is necessary. One: PDE solvers need this for adding projection steps). But since development has halted, we're pretty much guaranteed that none of this will ever come.

3JPLW 9y ago

The fact that it's not licensed for redistribution or even any regular use is a pretty good reason to not futz with it. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/what-if-pre-release-license-agreement/ https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/what-if-pre-releas... > Intel grants to you a non-exclusive, non-assignable copyright license to make only the minimum number of copies of the Materials reasonably necessary for your internal testing and development of your products. > You may not distribute any portion of Materials, whether in source or binary form, to any third party, except as specified in this Agreement.