4 ms·
I've been able to use F# at work for a few months now and I'm absolutely enamored with it. But I have not yet had any of what I call "ints, strings,and for loo
by arwhatever 9y ago
I've been able to use F# at work for a few months now and I'm absolutely enamored with it.
But I have not yet had any of what I call "ints, strings,and for loops-only developers," the folks who never really grasped O.O. very well at all, contribute to the code. I'll be eager see how that goes.
- Roboprog 9y agoGood point. Most of these "look how much better we did with X tool" comparisons usually have a strong sample bias in that the X team are highly motivated and talented. X probably does help them quite a bit, but perhaps not as much as indicated, especially once the thinks-in-Blub (and loves it!) lumpen-programmers get added to the project :-( I'd really like to move out of 1960s tech into 1970s tech, someday (e.g. - from Simula-67-inspired to Scheme/Smalltalk-inspired environments)
- hardlianotion 9y agoI am very enthused about functional languages like F# - don't know much about F# particularly and respect rather than love C#. I just find comparisons of this kind slightly off-putting. It's always an interesting time when you share your lovely clean concept with potential philistines - hope your project's exposure to your loop-community goes well.