I think his intention in stating that was only trying to focus on the objective, informational debate at hand, and not devolve into complaints about him being a

I think his intention in stating that was only trying to focus on the objective, informational debate at hand, and not devolve into complaints about him being a 'white supremacist', which people often use in debate to prematurely dispel arguments without considering their logic or point of view. Ironically enough, his attempt at focusing on the objective led to you solely responding with accusations about how 'being white etc etc etc'. Take arguments at face value; they can only be fully dispelled after reasoned, objective consideration. Also: I will say that your point is a really interesting one re: racial privilege, but it's not relevant to the validity of his immigration stance.