5 ms·
> What am I missing? That there is a patent actually associated with GraphQL, I believe.
by randallsquared 9y ago
> What am I missing?
That there is a patent actually associated with GraphQL, I believe.
- abiox 9y agothe funny thing is, this means that the patent grant previously shipped with react had basically zero relevance to using react (even after a patent dispute).
- seangrogg 9y agoYes, as was pointed out by the many that continued to use React.
- raulk 9y agoGraph query logic (US 9646028 B2) https://www.google.com/patents/US9646028 https://www.google.com/patents/US9646028
- hetspookjee 9y agoI don't understand how this can be a patent. I seem to be infringing on the patent every day whenever I try to navigate through xmls and json files with a friendly API. Can anyone shed some light on how this patent is innovative?
- abiox 9y agoit's a commonly held view that software patents are almost entirely garbage.
- graphememes 9y agoyou can remove the almost from that sentence.
- tzs 9y agoThere is a patent application associated with React. https://www.google.com/patents/US20170221242 https://www.google.com/patents/US20170221242