4 ms·

> 1%? I don't think that's a real number. It can be much faster, especially since this is just one of many-to-come improvements. I am getting 73 in Speedometer

by ko27 9y ago

> 1%? I don't think that's a real number. It can be much faster, especially since this is just one of many-to-come improvements. I am getting 73 in Speedometer 2 on Chrome Canary vs 66 Mozilla is touting here. Also as shown in their own video, Chrome loads faster on some pages. So FF might actually be slower. It's definitely not noticeably faster than Chrome. > Well, performance is one reason. Security could easily be another Both of those things can be counted in Chrome's favor as well.

staticassertion 9y ago
> So FF might actually be slower. It's definitely not noticeably faster than Chrome. Yep, on some pages, on some benchmarks, it can go either way. I think this more brings Firefox to a competitive place, and shows the potential for the project Quantum - there's much more to come, webrender in particular. > Both of those things can be counted in Chrome's favor as well. Totally. Whether one browser is more secure than another is a complicated topic.