2 ms·
I wonder if this is a complete list of his cases. Given that he's been a laywer for 7 years, I'm inclined to think not, but I can't say I'm familiar enough with
by Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
I wonder if this is a complete list of his cases. Given that he's been a laywer for 7 years, I'm inclined to think not, but I can't say I'm familiar enough with the legal world to judge the quality of this source.
- tyingq 9y agoIt says he was a judicial clerk through 2013. And I assume both he and his father would be aware of the potential issues with optics. Edit: Optics meaning the appearance of bias, nepotism, etc. I don't dispute the judge is supporting patent trolls. There is, though, no evidence it's for personal financial gain, and I suspect there's been significant digging. It is perhaps just ego driven.
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoWhat is "optics"? And I offer these guys very little trust, given that the father is the shadiest and most notorious patent troll player in the country.
- floatingatoll 9y agoThe “optics” of a situation are “how it would be perceived in a critical evaluation”, especially in the press. So the optics of having a son bring patent case to his father’s patent-friendly district are very poor.