> Why is the overwhelming majority of networked software still not secure, despite all effort to the contrary? Why is it almost certain to get exploited so long

> Why is the overwhelming majority of networked software still not secure, despite all effort to the contrary? Why is it almost certain to get exploited so long as attackers can craft its inputs? Why is it the case that no amount of effort seems enough to fix software that must speak certain protocols? That's interesting, but I'm not sure it's relevant here because downloading and executing arbitrary code without understanding what it does is a fundamentally insecure thing to do. Unfortunately, the same technology is used by Facebook, Google, etc. to track people around the internet, so it's unlikely to get "fixed" any time soon.