4 ms·
Doesn't the term negotiate or renegotiate imply the consensus of more than one party? As far as "can be done," meaning it is legally possible to renegotiate, w
by Clubber 9y ago
Doesn't the term negotiate or renegotiate imply the consensus of more than one party?
As far as "can be done," meaning it is legally possible to renegotiate, which it is.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> Doesn't the term negotiate or renegotiate imply the consensus of more than one party? No, it implies trying to reach such a consensus, not the existence of such a consensus. The practicality of attempting to find consensus is different than that of actually finding it. > As far as "can be done," meaning it is legally possible to renegotiate, which it is. Then that was a stupid and pointless response to the comment about the need for consensus, which raised an issue of pragmatics, not legal possibility.
- Clubber 9y ago>Then that was a stupid and pointless response to the comment about the need for consensus Hah. Pot, meet kettle.