3 ms·
My goal with these scripts is really to prevent inappropriate use of the constructs I described. Reading the article over again, I do see how it makes it seems
by mattmight 16y ago
My goal with these scripts is really to prevent inappropriate use of the constructs I described. Reading the article over again, I do see how it makes it seems like I'm on a quest to ban these constructs. That's my fault for not being clearer. ;)
Most of the time, my students use these constructs without thinking about it. That's the real problem.
Perhaps I should have posted a few paragraphs from a recent draft to highlight what I meant by inappropriate (or excessive) use, but I don't think my grad students would appreciate a public shaming.
As I mentioned in the article, there are times when the passive voice and adverbs have their uses.
It would be a net positive if my grad students removed all their adverbs and all passive voice from their recent drafts.
(Of course, the optimum would be to leave only the appropriate uses of these constructs.)
I'm willing to bet this is true for a lot of new grad students in science or engineering first learning how to do scientific writing.
It was certainly true for me once upon a time.
Having the scripts highlight these constructs forces students to ask the question, "Is there a way I can say this better?"
If the answer really is "No," then they can leave it in.
But, I want them to think about it.
/article author
- blahedo 16y ago> If the answer really is "No," then they can leave it in. Ah! That bothers me a lot less, then; I still wonder about some of the choices, and I think you underestimate the utility of adverbs and passives, but if you were stating style preferences rather than rules, that seems fine. Unfortunately, the linked post as written still appears to propagate the dumb Elements of Style canards as if they were absolute rules. :P