You've phrased your response in a way that seems to prevent falsification, but I'll give it a shot anyway. For example-- the Trump administration's initial tra

You've phrased your response in a way that seems to prevent falsification, but I'll give it a shot anyway. For example-- the Trump administration's initial travel ban executive order was blocked by the courts based directly on issues of consitutionality. Furthermore, if you read the text of that bill you can tell the authors were careful not to use the frank, unambiguous language that Trump used on the campaign trail as that would have been thrown out by the courts even more quickly. So there you have it-- an example where the current administration did the opposite of ignoring the U.S. constitution, and a court system that blocked the executive order even though the administration tried to skirt the intent of the constitution (namely, the 1st amendment). Does this falsify your statement? If you don't think so, please give me an example of what you think would falsify it and I'll give that a shot.