Motives? It is sometimes needed to balance rights. We need to fight nazism, therefor we need to forbid those things. But that's not happening here, there is no

Motives? It is sometimes needed to balance rights. We need to fight nazism, therefor we need to forbid those things. But that's not happening here, there is no balance being stuck. There is just "remove all characteristics of a legal system" (Rechtsstaatlichkeit) on the one side, and the gain is "have the means for absolute power". Edit: I feel that question leans too much into pure politics, and was hesitant answering. The link with HN is that the story is also about criminalizing encryption. Mein Kampf, not so much linked.