3 ms·
I've seen that fall apart in the US too. The defendant tried arguing 4th amendment privacy protections over the information obtained in property that implicate
by ringaroundthetx 9y ago
I've seen that fall apart in the US too.
The defendant tried arguing 4th amendment privacy protections over the information obtained in property that implicated him, but the judge said that didn't apply unless he admitted to owning the property which would equally incriminate him if he did, haha.
very narrow protection
- splintercell 9y agoHas any such case ever gone to Supreme Court?
- ringaroundthetx 9y agoNothing similar to the one I was mentioning. Always evolving protections around computational and digital properties.