> It says woman are in control of marriage, what men want is irrelevant. They aren't saying that. You wouldn't suggest that a man be able to force an uninteres

> It says woman are in control of marriage, what men want is irrelevant. They aren't saying that. You wouldn't suggest that a man be able to force an uninterested woman to marry him, would you? Surely we want both women and men (or whatever the genders) to have complete veto power in this, right? (Not that you can't argue that it's a sexist reason not to want to marry someone. I don't think it is but I can see how it's debatable.)