3 ms·
Why not try rolling your own? * http://projects.jga.me/jquery-builder/ http://projects.jga.me/jquery-builder/ * https://www.ericponto.com/blog/2014/10/05/es6-
by 52-6F-62 9y ago
Why not try rolling your own?
* http://projects.jga.me/jquery-builder/ http://projects.jga.me/jquery-builder/
* https://www.ericponto.com/blog/2014/10/05/es6-dom-library/ https://www.ericponto.com/blog/2014/10/05/es6-dom-library/
- rhizome 9y agoHow do I get jQ without <IE9 support?
- 52-6F-62 9y agoCan't help you there specifically. However, depending on what you need from jQuery, you might consider writing your own DOM library so you can have some control over the size. If you have a look at some of the comments above, you'll see that many jQuery advantages are met with equivalent features in vanilla JS, just slightly more verbose. It isn't difficult to write a wrapper for some of the major jQuery features. That second link is a terse example of this.