4 ms·
The downside to pipenv is that there aren't any good docker images to work with it. I've tried a few times, but I've never given enough time to learning the gut
by vforgione 9y ago
The downside to pipenv is that there aren't any good docker images to work with it. I've tried a few times, but I've never given enough time to learning the guts of Docker to make anything stable enough to run with it.
- dfee 9y agoThat shouldn't be too much of a problem. I'll have to port an image over later to use pipenv, so I'll share a gist to a minimal Dockerfile.
- mjhea0 9y agohave you tried https://github.com/VaultVulp/pipenv-alpine/blob/master/Dockerfile https://github.com/VaultVulp/pipenv-alpine/blob/master/Docke...?
- vforgione 9y agoI did, but something about Alpine rubs me the wrong way. I know it's probably irrational, but my gut always goes to Debian. I really can't justify it. Maybe I should give it a better chance.
- dfee 9y agoHere's my Dockerfile: https://gist.github.com/dfee/388c3f270fdfc4f31aba906770f93137 https://gist.github.com/dfee/388c3f270fdfc4f31aba906770f9313...
- vforgione 9y agoVery cool. I'll have to give it a whirl. I haven't taken a stab at a custom image in a while. Thanks!