That’s not the original contention. Beside, you’re not doing that either in the boardgame. You either see it as a whole or focus on some detail. Even if you try

That’s not the original contention. Beside, you’re not doing that either in the boardgame. You either see it as a whole or focus on some detail. Even if you try to see it all, the brain can focus only on one aspect at a time - the overview or the detail. Believing you can see both is disingenuous on how brain work. Sure all the paper may be laid out for you to see, but to read any stat you’d need to focus on a single element. Not unlike zooming in computers. The fact is, computers are great to present multilevel information and hide complexity on demand while allowing user to explore and discover details, while maintaining track of all the constraints of the game world. Of course if you postulate that picking a paper and see the detail is unlike zooming in and out on a game then you can claim the point to stand, but that’s basically so controved and poignant just to pretend computer can’t do what paper does that’s weird to even to have to debate it.