4 ms·
This is also an important example of how limiting an anti-social attitude can be when trying to collaborate and have a large affect on the world. As brilliant
by kweinber 9y ago
This is also an important example of how limiting an anti-social attitude can be when trying to collaborate and have a large affect on the world. As brilliant as Jon is, he wasted an inordinate amount of time making up for constantly insulting people, places, and approaches. (Even today he couldn't avoid insulting all of Tulsa OK).
Imagine where windowing systems could be if his brilliant work, API thoughts, and insights weren't delivered with insults, arrogance and vitriol.
At the end it is sad that he was proud of being right even though he was an _hole (his word). It could have been that he was right and his best ideas were in common use.
- MycroftJones 9y agoI didn't realize people were so sensitive in the field. Compared to Linus, Theo de Raadt, Richard Stallman, etc, Jon seemed to be cruising at a comfortable level of Germanic straight-forward truth-telling, no real aholishness I could detect. Guess I should reset my etiquette and politeness filters.
- adrianratnapala 9y agoI note that the people you name all built their communities through work they did well outside the corporate world.
- digi_owl 9y agoAnd at least two of them have a undeserved reputation.
- MycroftJones 9y agoYou mean Theo and Linus? Yes.
- rbanffy 9y agoTheo's reputation is very well deserved.
- kweinber 9y agoPeople are sensitive in every field. Even if they weren't, there is very little to be gained by needlessly insulting them. Working hard to build great stuff and arguing/fighting for what is right can be forceful without being debasing, divisive, or insulting.
- akira2501 9y ago> how limiting an anti-social attitude can be when trying to collaborate There are those of us who see collaboration as orthogonal to innovation and thus don't put any effort into it. Fortunately, there's a good mix of talent and dispositions out there to make up for it. > Imagine where windowing systems could be if his brilliant work, API thoughts, and insights weren't delivered with insults, arrogance and vitriol. Imagine a world where everyone is the same and has the same set of values. That may seem like paradise to some, but it sounds like doom to me. > At the end it is sad that he was proud of being right He was proud that he didn't compromise, even though that would've been easier, and no one would've faulted him for it.
- kpxxx 9y agoImagine if the creator of the ideal windowing system wasn't aborted in the 1960s.