4 ms·
Superdeterminism would, by definition, restrict the experimenters' freedom. Of course, it's untestable, and it seems independent of whether or not there are rem
by monktastic1 9y ago
Superdeterminism would, by definition, restrict the experimenters' freedom. Of course, it's untestable, and it seems independent of whether or not there are remaining entanglements from the big bang. Unless I'm missing something?
Suppose we are entangled in some state:
|we choose to measure observable A> @ |x> + |we choose B> @ |y>
Why would this determine which choice we make?
- naasking 9y ago> Superdeterminism would, by definition, restrict the experimenters' freedom. Yes, I said as much. That still doesn't entail that science is impossible though. > Of course, [superdeterminism is] untestable As is every other interpretation of QM.
- monktastic1 9y agoYeah, sorry, I wasn't contradicting you. Mostly curious how entanglement relates to the superdeterminism. As best I can tell it shouldn't.