3 ms·
I left it running for some hours and got alot more 30ms responses: https://imgur.com/a/SdWtc https://imgur.com/a/SdWtc
by emj 9y ago
I left it running for some hours and got alot more 30ms responses:
https://imgur.com/a/SdWtc https://imgur.com/a/SdWtc
- emj 9y agoChrome use ~100% cpu transceiving ~83 packets per second, and I think it sends packets at a slower rate later on, that's why we get so many 30ms responses when we wait some hours. This is a tcpdump after loading the page: \time sudo tcpdump -c 1000 -ni eth0 udp and port 9777 1000 packets captured 1000 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel 0.02user 0.05system 0:12.45elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 5472maxresident)k 0inputs+8outputs (0major+1508minor)pagefaults 0swaps This is just a flood ping, interesting that the UDP version shoots more packets. \time sudo ping -f -c 1000 188.166.46.128 PING 188.166.46.128 (188.166.46.128) 56(84) bytes of data. .... --- 188.166.46.128 ping statistics --- 1000 packets transmitted, 996 received, 0% packet loss, time 14195ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.839/38.641/50.433/5.152 ms, pipe 5, ipg/ewma 14.209/41.787 ms 0.02user 0.13system 0:14.31elapsed 1%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2248maxresident)k 0inputs+8outputs (0major+1183minor)pagefaults 0swaps