4 ms·
Yep! The mathematics is pretty simple and recurs in a bunch of other places, from the theory of evolution by natural selection, to the question of why things go
by drostie 9y ago
Yep! The mathematics is pretty simple and recurs in a bunch of other places, from the theory of evolution by natural selection, to the question of why things go viral on the Internet.
The basic idea is that these sorts of objects are routinely seeing spontaneous nuclear decays -- there might be billions per millisecond of these. What's important is that each nuclear decay is an explosion which releases debris that can cause other nearby nuclei to decay as a result. So it becomes important to know: what is the average number N of nuclei which fall apart as a direct result of getting hit by the shrapnel of one decaying nucleus?
Since nothing is terribly exact in physics there are two regimes to consider, N < 1 and N > 1. In that first regime we can roughly calculate that we need to multiply this baseline billions-per-millisecond rate of spontaneous decays by the number
1 + N + N² + N³ + ... = 1/(1 - N)
The virality analogy is "Given one person shares it, what is the average number N of their friends who share it?" As you can see as this gets closer to N=1 it goes towards infinity.
For N > 1 the same multiplier holds but it cannot be summed infinitely: instead we realize that each term takes a slightly longer time period and thus the growth goes something like e^(k t) for some k, it's an exponential growth towards a majority of the sample reacting.
For fissile materials like plutonium, an easy way to increase N is to just bring two plutonium rods closer together: free debris from explosions in the one now cause new explosions in the other. This is called forming a "critical mass" hence the language about "criticality". Another way is to bring in these "neutron reflectors" that reflect the debris back into the same sample, it's basically the same principle.
- madengr 9y agoIf the critical mass of Pu-239 is 11 kg, can you go below that, say 5 kg, by reflecting the neutrons. I just wondering how much below that 11 kg you can go.
- Abekkus 9y agoIs there a static substance that reflects loose neutrons? I thought that the choices for a substance were either to let the neutron pass through, or to absorb the neutron
- dasmoth 9y agoYes [1]. Beryllium is, I believe, the material of choice (although comes with its own problems, e.g. stupidly toxic dust) [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_reflector https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_reflector
- userbinator 9y agoIf you're already working with plutonium, whose dust is also very, very toxic (in addition to being radioactive), the additional danger of beryllium doesn't seem so great in comparison.
- cjsuk 9y agoI routinely handled beryllium for a couple of years as it is present in certain electronic RF power amplifiers. It’s perfectly safe in solid form. If you drill it or smash it, a different matter! Plutonium, not so much.
- eloff 9y agoI knew a software engineer who made a lot of money in a startup and bought himself an ultralight bike of titanium and beryllium. They ceased the beryllium parts at the Canadian border and I don't think he ever managed to get them released to him.
- badmin_ 9y agoBeryllium's also used as a neutron multiplier.
- madengr 9y agoI think only about 2% of the population is sensitive to beryllium. I was in a beryllium monitoring program (yearly blood tests) at work. A few coworkers are sensitive, one getting really sick.
- rleigh 9y agoBeryllium, amongst others.