3 ms·
The MIT license does not explicitly mention patents. However, depending on the lawyer, an argument could be made that it contains an implicit patent license. I
by uiri 9y ago
The MIT license does not explicitly mention patents. However, depending on the lawyer, an argument could be made that it contains an implicit patent license. I think that Facebook would have an uphill battle arguing that their relicensing didn't include patents after this kerfuffle.
- brodock 9y agoExactly. This is like: "oh you didn't like to receive the patent under this terms, get this, no patents grant anymore"
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]