3 ms·
> But also, this is a "well actually" that attempts to dodge the substance of my post to chip away at it. I'm not sure it is. Your assertion was a central tene
by deepnotderp 9y ago
> But also, this is a "well actually" that attempts to dodge the substance of my post to chip away at it.
I'm not sure it is. Your assertion was a central tenet of your argument. Abortion, although I totally agree with it being allowed, is admittedly a messy issue, and I can see why it's polarizing. Trying to frame that as an example for why women supposedly don't have equal rights is IMHO disingenuous.
- KirinDave 9y agoNo. My assertion is that women in many places simply cannot buy many types of health care because they're associated with reproductive needs.
- deepnotderp 9y agoBut I don't see any evidence of that. They can buy it, just not usually with federal funds.
- KirinDave 9y agoYou should research this then. I've provided a link in other parts of this thread, please refer to it as the root. Because I really question if you'd know simply by casually inspecting your surroundings.
- deepnotderp 9y agoI've read your link and replied to it. It only points to a grand total of three conservative states cutting off federal funding.