There are a lot of lies in the article, and the rest is an intricate hit piece on privacy rights, with the false equivalence between privacy and anarchy/crimina

There are a lot of lies in the article, and the rest is an intricate hit piece on privacy rights, with the false equivalence between privacy and anarchy/criminality (e.g. the idea that 'only criminals have something to hide'). Ironically the author protects the privacy of his contributors at the end of the article.