There are opinions that it did its main purpose of decoding mp3 not very well: - http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_winamp2_62.html http://mp3decoders.mp

There are opinions that it did its main purpose of decoding mp3 not very well: - http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_winamp2_62.html http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_winamp2_62.html - https://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/ https://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/ Most versions of Winamp 2.x had their own Nitrane decoder which is "inaccurate", some versions had Fraunhoffer decoder which is ok. However, I'm not sure if differences in sound are noticeable on non-high-end hardware, some people say that very noticeable. Also, UI was super-cool and iconic but usability was not the first concern (back then, software had to be cool and spectacular, everyone used screensavers and players had to include visualizations). It was very small (I used 800x600 resolution but it looked too small), it relied on Windows file select dialog to add tracks and file select dialog is one of the slowest and most frustrating UIs in most OSes.