> "But you can't damage a child through non-exposure; it's just not possible in the first place." Whether honest non-exposure might be fine is beyond even an a

> "But you can't damage a child through non-exposure; it's just not possible in the first place." Whether honest non-exposure might be fine is beyond even an academic concern. It's overwhelmingly improbable that a child could be raised without being exposed to those things; short of willful sheltering.