Rotten Tomatoes is a bad system because it's binary - ie thumbs up/down. Which means a 'consistently good' film can get almost all thumbs up - even if it's not

Rotten Tomatoes is a bad system because it's binary - ie thumbs up/down. Which means a 'consistently good' film can get almost all thumbs up - even if it's not that-that good. Whereas an unevenly good films, with pangs of genius can get not so many thumbs up. It tends to skew way up or down. Metacritic I think is much better.