> If you would leave out the prologue of the story, and make it into a story where the accusations actually were true. Then noone would have blinked about what

> If you would leave out the prologue of the story, and make it into a story where the accusations actually were true. Then noone would have blinked about what happened. If that's true, then we have a huge problem. Basically I'm hearing this in that comment: If someone is innocent, they are innocent until proved guilty. If someone is guilty, they are guilty until proved innocent. The problem with that idea is supremely obvious.