3 ms·
This should be on page 1. Would need to thoroughly test this to truly evaluate but based on quick glance, a few coments/suggestions: [ ] results should be
by feelin_googley 9y ago
This should be on page 1.
Would need to thoroughly test this to truly evaluate but based on quick glance, a few coments/suggestions:
[ ] results should be numbered
[ ] purpose of "relevant domains" not clear
[ ] ranking methodology should be explained, e.g., stackoverflow and wikipedia being more heavily weighted
[ ] need to attach tld when using inurl, e.g. inurl:-wikipedia does not work
[ ] open source the code, like gigablast
[ ] does not appear to be "internet" search engine i.e. only searches web
[ ] provide export of list all results to CSV or some open text based format making ranking irrelevant and enabling user to resort according to own criteria
[ ] what is the name of the crawler and do some sites block it
[ ] publish the rate limits on queries if any
Overall it looks very nice i.e. simplicity of design compared to other alternative public web search engines and faster than some.
EDIT: Found blog post at https://medium.com/tsignal https://medium.com/tsignal with more info.