I read the entire article before I posted. Despite the downvotes, I stand by my original claim. This article sheds no insight on the mechanism, and takes a su

I read the entire article before I posted. Despite the downvotes, I stand by my original claim. This article sheds no insight on the mechanism, and takes a supercilious tone towards those who believed in the "old" ideas. This is akin to someone announcing a paper that shows evidence of a "fifth force" (baryonic) after all (30 years or so later) and dismisses everybody who believed in the old law of mass attraction (gravity only) as being silly. IMHO, it's a shitty way to be, especially when you don't even bother to present the new insight.