Long, long long article, and then: > Compared with the water needs of agriculture and energy production, the bottled water business is barely responsible for a

Long, long long article, and then: > Compared with the water needs of agriculture and energy production, the bottled water business is barely responsible for a trickle; in Michigan, it accounts for less than 1 percent of total water usage Right. So all this stuff about water shortages, the amount of water being used, the amount being charged for the water is meaningless. The entire article is pointless. (I also loved the way they tried to blame Pakistan's poor infrastructure on Nestlé.)