4 ms·
> But Go doesn't have a JIT, and its performance is good enough that I don't expect one to emerge any time soon. that's true. that is... until a (real) Go inte
by sbinet 9y ago
> But Go doesn't have a JIT, and its performance is good enough that I don't expect one to emerge any time soon.
that's true.
that is... until a (real) Go interpreter shows up.
something that's bound to happen when Go will be used for (data) exploratory work.
- jerf 9y agoI poked around with writing a Go interpreter a while back. There are a number of issues that make it practically infeasible. You can get some hacked-up stuff off of GitHub, but those hacked up things are pretty much the best you can do right now. But as per my other thread in this thread, if the scientific community becomes big enough I wouldn't be surprised they fork Go entirely, at which point that opens up a lot more options.
- sbinet 9y agoas I am working on https://github.com/go-interpreter/wagon https://github.com/go-interpreter/wagon, I'd be very interested in these issues you're talking about.