Pretty sure the point of the article is that the idea that we need to take the full round of antibiotics is itself an exaggeration of one study that's now known

Pretty sure the point of the article is that the idea that we need to take the full round of antibiotics is itself an exaggeration of one study that's now known to be wrong, and dangerously so. If we've been creating resistant bacteria because we've been following this "take it all" mentality, then I don't really blame the author for getting a little worked up over this.