5 ms·
Then I am curious about what makes RLS or the alike so hard to onboard? Common IDE features like reliable and responsive "jump to definition", "Find all referen
by e3b0c 9y ago
Then I am curious about what makes RLS or the alike so hard to onboard? Common IDE features like reliable and responsive "jump to definition", "Find all references" and "Renaming symbols" are 90% of all I would ask for. Do Rust devs have less attention to the area?
- steveklabnik 9y agoThose three things already work in the RLS. And more: https://www.ncameron.org/blog/what-the-rls-can-do/ https://www.ncameron.org/blog/what-the-rls-can-do/
- mswift42 9y agoIs there an editor that supports jump to definition for macros?
- steveklabnik 9y agoI don't know. I have a hunch that lots of macros still will be better with the new macro system, but we'll see. Anyway, regardless, there's certainly more work to do! And it's being actively developed quite heavily. For example, it will be on stable Rust very soon.
- mswift42 9y agoThanks.